The History of Palestine in New Testament Times
Herod the Great
From 63 B.C.E. Palestine was subject to Rome. In that year
the Roman general Pompey marched on Jerusalem, and after a three month
siege entered the city, went into the Temple, and even inspected the Holy
of Holies—a terrible desecration of the Temple. He made Hyrcanus both
high priest and local ruler, thus bringing the Hasmonean line to an end.
During the next two troubled decades, Antipater emerged as the most
powerful figure in Palestine, although he was never designated king.
Finally, in 40 B.C.E., Herod, a son of Antipater, was named king of the
Jews by Rome, although it was not until 37 B.C.E. that he entered
Jerusalem and gained control of his kingdom.
B.C.E., “Before the Common Era,” is a theologically neutral
equivalent to B.C., “Before Christ;” just as C.E.,
“Common Era,” is a neutral equivalent to A.D. (anno domini), “the year of our
Lord.”
Herod was the most competent Jewish king of this period
and amply earned the title, “Herod the Great,” bestowed on him by
historians. He was an able administrator, who loyally carried out the
wishes of Rome. He kept the peace, reduced banditry in the land, and for
his efforts was awarded additional territories to rule. His building
activity was carried out on a lavish scale—aqueducts, amphitheatres,
citadels, the city of Caesarea, and most notably the new Temple in
Jerusalem, which he restored to the grandeur of Solomon’s time. Yet he
never did gain the approval of his Jewish subjects, who always regarded
him as an alien (he was an Idumean, or Edomite).
Herod dealt ruthlessly with real or suspected opponents,
even having three of his sons and his wife Mariamne murdered; so the story
of the massacre of the innocents (Matthew 2:16) is entirely in character.
He died unmourned in 4 B.C.E.
The New Testament dates the birth
of Jesus from the reign of Herod (Matthew 2:1); hence, the birth of Jesus
must be dated in 4 B.C.E. or earlier. This chronological anomaly
originated in the miscalculation of Herod’s death by a fifth century
Roman monk, Dionysius Exiguus, who was largely responsible for the
chronological system which dates events from before or after the birth of
Jesus.
The Successors of Herod
Upon his death, Herod’s kingdom was divided among his
sons:
 | Archelaus ruled over Judea, Samaria and Idumea from 4
B.C.E. to 6 C.E., but was removed for his incompetence and replaced by
a series of Roman governors or procurators, who administered his
territory. The best known of these was Pontius Pilate (26-36 C.E.). |
 | Herod Antipas (4 B.C.E. to C.E. 39) ruled over Galilee
and a strip of Transjordan called Perea (he is the Herod referred to
during the ministry of Jesus). |
 | Philip (4 B.C.E. to C.E. 34) ruled over a modest area
northeast of the Sea of Galilee. |
It was Roman policy to allow a large measure of local
freedom to the peoples of the empire, but the Jews were restive under the
pagan rule of Rome, and yearned for the independence which they had
enjoyed for barely a century under the Hasmonean kings. One incompetent
procurator after another added to the unrest, as did a system of
tax-collection which was bitterly resented: native Jews called “publicani”
(the publicans or tax-collectors, referred to in the gospels) were given a
concession to collect taxes for Rome and any additional amounts which they
could extort for themselves.
From C.E. 41 to 44, Palestine was again ruled by a Jewish
king, Herod Agrippa I, a grandson of Herod the Great. But a sudden illness
brought the reign of this popular king to an end, and Palestine came once
more under the rule of Roman procurators. The resumption of direct rule by
Rome renewed Jewish hatred and fueled the activities of revolutionaries.
Even wise and competent rulers would have had difficulty keeping the
peace, and the procurators were neither.
The Jewish War of 66-70
In C.E. 66 the Jewish revolt broke out; in spite of some
early successes, it was put down by the overwhelming force of the Roman
legions in C.E. 70. Jerusalem was leveled and the Temple destroyed.
Profound dislocations followed for the Jewish religion, which
thenceforward was obliged to function without the Temple and its
ceremonies, so central in ancient Jewish practice. Dislocations were also
experienced by the Christians, for whom Jerusalem had been the center. A
last desperate revolt by the Jews followed in C.E. 132-135, under
Bar Cochba. It also was cruelly suppressed. A Roman colony was established
on the ruins of Jerusalem, a temple to Jupiter was erected, and Jews were
forbidden to enter the city.
The Language of Palestine
The common language of this period in Palestine was
Aramaic, akin to the language of Syria. Aramaic terms have survived in the
gospels (which were written in Greek); see Mark 5:41. Some Hebrew was spoken, and in the synagogues
it was not unusual to find those who could read the scriptures in Hebrew. Some Greek was spoken by people
in the cities or in territories adjacent to Hellenistic cities. While the
dissemination of Hellenistic culture was generally resisted by the Jews,
they did not seem to object to the use of the Greek language.
Although Jews of whatever persuasion shared a common
loyalty to the Mosaic Law (in Hebrew, Torah), first century Judaism
was marked by considerable diversity. The principal groups were the
Sadducees, Pharisees, Zealots and Essenes.
The
Sadducees and the Temple
The
Sadducees were the priestly aristocracy of the Temple. They were drawn
from those who held highpriestly offices and from influential Jerusalem
families. This sect controlled the Temple and its considerable revenues.
The Temple was the emotional center of Judaism. In addition to the daily
round of offerings, prayers and sacrifices, it was the scene of the three
great pilgrim festivals: Passover, which commemorated God’s
deliverance in the Exodus from Egypt; Pentecost, which celebrated
the giving of the Law; and Tabernacles, which recalled Israel’s
wilderness wanderings.
The Sadducees held to a narrow interpretation of the Law,
upholding the authority of the written Law but rejecting the oral Law.
Likewise, they rejected the belief in the resurrection (see Mark
12:18-27), as an innovation without foundation in the scriptures. In their
position of wealth and influence, the Sadducees cooperated with the Roman
occupation as an expedient way of maintaining their privileges.
The
Pharisees and the Synagogue
More numerous than the Sadducees and more influential
among the people was the religious group known as Pharisees. They were
dominant in the synagogue, which in many ways was more important than the
Temple, especially in daily and weekly instruction and worship. The Temple
was too remote for most Jews to visit except for the major feast days, but
synagogues were close by wherever Jews lived, whether in Palestine or
beyond. Ten male adult Jews constituted a quorum. The synagogue was
essentially a gathering of the Jewish community for study and
interpretation of the Law, though worship was becoming a prominent part of
synagogue life, with prayers, chanting of psalms, the recitation of the shema‘
(Deuteronomy 6:4-5), and some type of edifying discourse. While our
sources are somewhat limited for reconstructing pre-70 C.E. Pharisaism, we are
probably correct in the view that the Pharisees were the dominant force in
the synagogue.
The Pharisees differed from the Sadducees most
significantly in accepting the oral Law as well as the written Law. The
oral Law was a body of unwritten legal opinions intended to make the Law
applicable to changing situations. Thus the scribes, or experts in the
Law, had identified thirty-nine different kinds of work in the written Law
which were prohibited on the Sabbath; in the oral Law each of these types
of work was expanded to include thirty-nine sub-categories of work,
resulting in some 1521 different kinds of work which were prohibited on
the Sabbath. Behind all this study and labor was the overwhelming
conviction that God’s will was perfectly revealed in the Law of Moses,
and that this Law was applicable to every situation in life.
This readiness to expand and update ancient practices was
matched by the Pharisees’ acceptance of certain doctrines such as a
belief in the resurrection of the dead. Their attitude toward Rome may be
described as one of opposition, though not normally one of armed
resistance.
The Zealots were apparently Pharisaic in their views, with
the notable exception that they advocated and practiced armed resistance
against the Roman occupation. This group sparked the revolt against Rome
(66-70 C.E.), which had such disastrous consequences for the Jewish
nation.
For convenience, we refer to a fourth major group in first
century Palestine as Essenes; or, more accurately, as the Covenanters of
Qumran. These are the people who occupied the monastic community situated
on the shores of the Dead Sea. This community produced the famous Dead Sea
Scrolls, writings which were hidden in nearby caves during a time of
crisis. These scrolls came to light in 1947 and in the years following,
and are one of the major archeological finds of the twentieth century.
Excavations of the archeological site of Qumran at the northwest corner of
the Dead Sea from 1951 to 1956 have provided ample illumination of
the life of this sect, whose members had secluded themselves from society
to devote themselves in strict discipline to the study of the Law.
The scrolls, which were copied, produced and treasured by
these men—for they were a male community which lived a celibate
life—give evidence of a highly organized group following the pattern
laid down in The Manual of Discipline, a scroll found in one of the
caves. Theirs was a strict religious communism requiring each new member
to turn over any wealth he had to the community. They were admitted to
full membership after a probation period of two years. They participated
in common meals which were presided over by a priest. Their earnestness in
the study of the Law is seen in a system for around-the-clock study of the
Law by at least some members of the community, presumably in shifts. They
were scrupulous in their attention to ritual cleanliness, and there is
also some evidence that members admitted to the community by a ritual
washing, which baptism resembles in some respects. This covenanting
community came to an end in 68 C.E., when they were overrun by the Romans
during the Jewish revolt of 66-70.
Most Jews of this period belonged to none of these four
sects; they were known as “the People of the Land,” (in Hebrew, ‘am
ha-aretz), that is, the common people, or peasants. Most people lacked
the inclination or the leisure to join the ranks of the Pharisees. The
Pharisees had nothing but contempt for these folk because of their
casual attitude toward observance of the Law.
Post-70 C.E. Judaism
The disastrous war of 66-70 brought an end to the
Sadducees, for the Temple, the foundation of their influence, was
destroyed, never to be rebuilt. The Zealots, except for a resurgence in
the second Jewish revolt of 132-35 C.E., lost all credibility in their
program of armed resistance against Rome. The covenanting community of
Qumran disappeared in 68, as we have already noted. The Pharisees were
left as the major group to survive the war and to give their stamp to
historic Judaism, down to the present day, but especially to what today is
called Orthodox Judaism.
There are several landmark events in post-70 Judaism which
may be mentioned:
 | The canon of the Jewish Bible was
finally determined,
at the gathering of rabbis (or learned teachers) in 90 C.E., at Jabneh (or Jamnia).
Previously, two of the three divisions of the Hebrew Bible had been
fixed: Torah (Genesis through Deuteronomy; canonically defined
in about 400 B.C.E.); and the Prophets
(the former prophets, comprising Joshua to 2 Kings, and the latter
prophets, comprising Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and the Twelve [Minor
Prophets]; canonically defined in about 200 B.C.E.). In 90 C.E., the third division, the Writings, was
also declared to be scripture, including Psalms, Daniel, and all the other books of the
Hebrew canon. (The term canon refers to the authoritative
limits of which books are recognized as scripture.) In later times
Jews often refer to their Bible as TaNaK,
representing the first letter of Torah, or Law; Nebi’im,
or Prophets; and Kethubhim, or Writings, the three
divisions of Scripture. |
 | The sad separation between Jewish Christians and the Jewish
synagogue appears to have been made final by the
requirement that these Christians renounce their belief in Jesus. (As is noted in Jerusalem Conference (1)
and Jerusalem Conference (2), the decision
of the apostles to approve a mission to the gentiles without the requirement of Torah
observance may also have contributed to the separation between
Christians and Jews.) |
 | In the course of time, the rabbis offered further elaborations of the oral law, to the point where the need
for codification and reduction to writing was recognized. This
collection of Law is called Mishnah, and was completed about
200 C.E. Mishnah was further elaborated in the Talmudic
literature of the fifth and sixth centuries C.E. |
Judaism Outside Palestine
The Jewish population in the first century of our era was,
according to some estimates, four to four and a half million, or about
seven percent of the total population of the Roman world. About seven
hundred thousand Jews lived in Palestine, one million in Egypt, and even
more in Syria, with some ten thousand in Rome. Jewish communities were to
be found in most of the major cities of the empire. The Jewish dispersion,
or diaspora, resulted from deportations, such as the Babylonian exile, and
from migration.
The Jewish Bible in Greek
Since Greek was the universal language of the ancient
world, Jews of the dispersion spoke Greek. The Septuagint was a
translation of the Hebrew Scriptures into Greek, for the benefit of these
Jews outside of Palestine, who no longer knew Hebrew.
Synagogue Life in the Diaspora
In the same way as for Jews in Palestine, loyalty to the
Law was the central feature of Hellenistic Judaism. Their religious life
centered almost exclusively on the synagogue, except for pilgrims who were
able to visit the Temple in Jerusalem for the great festivals. Yet Jews of
the dispersion were more in tune with Greek culture than their brothers
and sisters in Palestine. One of the great Jewish thinkers, Philo of
Alexandria, sought to interpret the Law in a way compatible with Greek
philosophy (or, put differently, the explication of philosophy employing
the categories of Torah, in allegorical fashion).
The response of their gentile neighbors was varied. The
Jews were regarded with contempt by some, and on occasion were the victims
of persecution. By others, they were shown respect because of the lofty
monotheism and the noble ethics of Jewish teaching. There were some
gentiles who sought admission to the Jewish community. These were received on condition that they follow the
requirements of the Law; that they submit to the rite of
circumcision;
that they receive a ceremonial washing; and that where possible they offer
sacrifice in the Temple. Such converts were called “proselytes.”
Other gentiles, called “God-fearers,” were unwilling
to submit to the ritual requirements for proselytes, but they were
attracted to the religious and ethical teachings of Judaism, and were
welcomed to the worship of the synagogue. It was among these God-fearers
that Christianity frequently received a sympathetic hearing, as the
proclamation of the Christian message spread outside of Palestine.
|
|
|
|

|
|